The Future of Artificial Intelligence and the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance: A Pivotal Moment in Human History

In Geneva, Switzerland, on July 6, 2026, the first UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance began. This event, established by a resolution of the UN General Assembly, gathered representatives of governments, technology companies, scientific communities, civil society, and international organizations to develop coordinated approaches to regulating one of the most influential technologies of the 21st century. The event, held from July 6 to 7, attracted over 4,000 delegates from 170 countries and received over 1,500 written applications. It was not just another international conference, but a point of bifurcation where it was decided whether humanity would manage the transformation carried by AI or allow it to manage itself.

Alarm Signal: Warnings from the Independent International Scientific Group on AI

The opening of the dialogue coincided with the presentation of the first report of the Independent International Scientific Group on AI, co-chaired by renowned scientist Yoshua Bengio and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Reissa. The document contained three main warnings that became the foundation for all subsequent discussions.

The first warning was about speed. The internet took 15 years to reach a billion users. AI achieved this in two years. UN Secretary-General António Guterres stated at the opening of the dialogue: \"AI is developing at a runaway speed — faster than humanity can keep up with. An experiment is being conducted on our societies without a plan and without consent.\" Systems are no longer just tools waiting for instructions — they write code, act in the network, and make decisions with less and less human control. Our institutions built to manage machines that follow commands are not ready for machines that make decisions.

The second warning was about power concentration. Computing power, data, and talent behind the most advanced systems are concentrated in the hands of a few companies and a few countries. Most states, including many developing ones, had no voice in decisions that would shape their future. \"When power imbalance is built into technology, inequality becomes part of the code,\" warned Guterres.

The third warning was about truth. Machine lies can now be as convincing as the truth, and true evidence can be dismissed as fake. This undermines the integrity of our information ecosystem and trust in it. As Maria Reissa said, \"If you cannot distinguish fact from fiction, you cannot have democracy.\"

Guterres' Four Priorities: Safety, Human Rights, Potential, and Transparency

In his speech, Guterres identified four key priorities for AI governance: safety, human rights, potential building, and transparency. These principles aim to translate broad global participation into concrete actions and make AI \"safer, fairer, more accessible, and more ethical.\"

The Secretary-General emphasized: \"The question is no longer whether AI will transform our world — it already is. The question is whether we will manage this transformation together or let it manage us.\" He also stated: \"We are the last generation that can establish the rules of coexistence between humanity and machines.\" The dialogue was not aimed at concluding a formal agreement but should lay the groundwork for future negotiations and create a common understanding of how to manage a technology that is developing faster than the rules intended to control it.

Key Themes of the Dialogue: Division, Safety, and Human Control

During the two-day work, a wide range of issues were discussed, reflecting the seven thematic clusters defined by the UN General Assembly resolution. The central theme was overcoming the \"digital divide.\" As noted by Estonian ambassador Rein Tamstaar, \"developers of advanced systems are concentrated in two countries [the US and China],\" leaving other states with many questions. Developing countries, in particular, fear that in the worst case, the AI gap will leave them behind forever.

AI safety became another key theme. Bengio warned that science currently cannot guarantee that as AI capabilities grow, it will not cause \"catastrophic harm.\" Participants emphasized that protective mechanisms are needed throughout the entire lifecycle of systems, not just at the stage of model training. Special attention was paid to protecting children from the risks associated with AI.

Human control and accountability were also at the center of discussions. As General Assembly President Anna Lena Börck noted, \"never before have the pace and scale of changes been so dazzling,\" and \"never before has it been so difficult to understand and adapt to these changes.\" She emphasized that \"something with such power, with such deep impact on our economy, social systems, defense, and, consequently, on our world and security, but especially even in our homes, our food, and our children's bedrooms, can only be meaningfully and safely managed collectively.\"

The Future of AI: From \"Generation\" to \"Planning\" and Autonomous Agents

While diplomats were discussing rules, the technological landscape continued to change rapidly. 2026 became a turning point in the development of AI. The main trend was the shift from simple generative models to \"agent AI\" — autonomous systems capable of performing multi-step tasks without constant human involvement: from personalized planning to cyber security and health condition assessment. More and more leading AI companies are focusing on increasing the ability of models to reason and perform tasks, promoting AI from the ability to \"generate\" to the ability to \"plan.\"

According to IDC forecasts, by 2026, 70% of organizations will be using \"composite AI\" that combines generative, process, predictive, and agent technologies. By 2027, the use of AI agents in global companies will increase tenfold, and the number of challenges will increase a thousandfold. Global AI spending in 2026 will reach $2.59 trillion, and by 2029, it will reach $700 billion just in the IT sector.

Challenges of the Future: Energy, Employment, and Sovereignty

However, with opportunities come new challenges. AI energy consumption is becoming a critical issue. As Sally Radwan, the chief digital director of the UN Environment Program, noted, \"the future of AI is inseparable from the future of the planet.\" Large-scale implementation of AI requires \"curbing the energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, as well as water and material consumption associated with AI.\"

The impact on the labor market also raises concerns. Research shows that 48% of companies have already reduced staff due to AI. At the same time, new professions and skill requirements are emerging: by 2027, 75% of hiring processes will include testing skills in AI. Generative AI and AI agents will create the first serious challenge to mass productivity tools in the last 30 years, leading to market changes worth $58 billion.

Another important trend is \"sovereign AI.\" By 2027, 35% of countries will be using regional AI platforms based on their own proprietary data. This reflects the desire of states to maintain control over their data and technological infrastructure in the face of increasing geopolitical competition.

Conclusion: A Moment of Choice That Will Determine the Future of Humanity

The UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance was a response to the challenge formulated by Guterres with utmost clarity: \"The choice before us is between managing by project and drifting by default.\" General Assembly President Anna Lena Börck reminded us that the UN Charter, adopted 81 years ago, obliges us to \"achieve international cooperation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian nature.\" AI is just such a problem.

\"Something with such power needs a global platform. It needs the United Nations,\" said Börck. And this is true. A technology that can reshape the economy, change the world of work, influence elections, and change the balance of power cannot be left to the discretion of a few countries or corporations.

The Global Dialogue was the beginning of a long journey. It did not provide ready-made solutions, but created a space for their development. It confirmed that the future of AI will be determined not only by technological capabilities but also by political will, international cooperation, and commitment to fundamental values — human rights, justice, and democratic control. As Yoshua Bengio said, \"We need a coordinated international and democratic approach where science and compassion remain our compass in navigating AI.\"

The question is no longer whether AI will transform our world. It already is. The question is whether we will manage this transformation together or let it manage us. And the answer to this question will determine not only the future of technology but also the future of humanity itself.

Permanent link to this publication: