The FIFA decision to suspend the suspension of the US national team forward Folarin Balogun after a phone call from President Donald Trump caused a bombshell effect in world football. This unprecedented intervention, without precedent since 1962, has split the sports community and led to a series of consequences — both on and off the field.

Background: what happened?

In the 1/16 final match of the 2026 World Cup against Bosnia and Herzegovina, which the US won 2:0, striker Folarin Balogun, who had already scored three goals in the tournament, received a direct red card on the 64th minute. The referee considered that he had harshly stepped on the ankle of defender Tarek Muharemovic. According to the rules, such an expulsion automatically led to a suspension for the next match — in this case, the decisive 1/8 final against Belgium.

Trump's Intervention: the call that changed everything

The subsequent development of events became unprecedented. US President Donald Trump, who, according to his own admission, initially did not know that a red card meant not only expulsion from the field but also a missed match, personally called FIFA President Gianni Infantino.

\n
• The essence of the request: Trump asked to reconsider the incident, claiming that he did not consider this a foul. He called the referee's decision \"outrageous injustice\" and the referee himself \"horrible).
\n
• Argumentation: The US President emphasized that the absence of the best striker would significantly reduce the Americans' chances of success, and his suspension would be a \"big stain\" on the reputation of the entire tournament.
\n

FIFA's Reaction: an unprecedented decision

FIFA took a step unprecedented in the modern history of the World Cups. The striker was allowed to play in the match against Belgium.

\n
• Legal wording: The red card was not annulled. Referring to Article 27 of its disciplinary code, FIFA postponed the enforcement of the suspension for one year.
\n
• Conditions: If Balogun commits an analogous offense during this probationary period, the suspension will take effect.
\n
• Precedent: This is the first case since 1962 when a player was allowed to play in a match that he should have missed due to a red card at the World Cup.
\n

World Reaction: anger, sarcasm, and \"red line\"

The decision of FIFA caused a storm of criticism worldwide, putting the reputation of the governing body of world football under attack.

\n
• The Belgium national team: The Belgium Football Federation said it was \"shocked\" by the decision, which \"contradicts the regulations,\" and promised to fight for justice. The Belgians were so angry that some hot-headed people suggested they even boycott the match.
\n
• UEFA: The European Football Union made a sharp statement, calling the intervention of FIFA \"unprecedented, unimaginable, and unjustified,\" which \"crossed the red line.\"
\n
• The head coach of the England national team: Thomas Tuchel called this decision a dangerous precedent, posing a rhetorical question: \"Where to draw the line?\"
\n

Outcome on the field: the US's defeat and Belgium's triumph

Contrary to expectations and hopes, Trump's intervention did not bring success to the US national team on the field.

\n
• Defeat: In the 1/8 final match, the Belgium national team routed the Americans 4:1.
\n
• Sarcasm: Belgian players openly mocked President Trump after one of the goals, performing his famous \"Trump dance.\"
\n
• Uselessness of amnesty: The \"pardoned\" Balogun was unable to show himself and did not help his team.
\n
• Symbolism: The attempt of the US to change the course of the tournament through political means ended in a crushing defeat.
\n

Conclusion: the price of intervention

The situation with Balogun's red card became a vivid example of how political power's intervention in sports can have far-reaching and extremely negative consequences. FIFA dealt a serious blow to its reputation, showing that it can go along with political leaders. European football demonstrated unity in protecting the rules of the game. And the US national team, despite all efforts, suffered a crushing defeat, confirming that on the field, it is not phone calls from the White House that decide, but the skill of players. Instead of triumph, the story will be remembered for the scandal and sarcasm.

Permanent link to this publication: