Amulet in Temples: Semiotics, Ritual, and Memory Politics

Introduction: Earth as Relic and Symbol

The practice of placing an amulet containing earth from places of historical memory (battlefields, places of the saints' death, destroyed sanctuaries, concentration camps) in temples or other sacred objects represents a complex religious-political ritual. It goes beyond a simple commemorative gesture, becoming an act of symbolic repatriation, the connection of sacred spaces, and the construction of collective identity. In this context, earth ceases to be just soil; it becomes a relic, a carrier of the "memory of place" (genius loci), a material testament to historical trauma or glory that should be "grafted" to the place of eternal memory – the temple.

1. Historical and Religious Roots: From Relics to "Blessed Earth"

The tradition has deep historical parallels:

Religion of relics in Christianity: The bringing and burial of fragments of the relics of saints (antimens) under the altar or under the throne is an obligation for the consecration of the temple. Earth from the place of martyrdom or the deeds of the saint serves here as an analogy or supplement to relics, especially if the relics themselves are lost. It is a contact relic (brandea), imbued with the sanctity of the place.

"Promised Land" and pilgrimage: In Jewish and Christian tradition, the land of Israel/Palestine itself is considered sacred. Bringing earth from Mount Zion, Golgotha, or Bethlehem for placement in the foundation of a temple in the diaspora symbolizes a spiritual connection with the source of faith, creating a "piece of Holy Land" in the foreign land.

Practice of "blessed earth": In the Russian Orthodox tradition, there was a custom of bringing earth from places sanctified by the monks' deeds (for example, from Valaam, Optina Pustyn) for placing in the foundation of new monasteries or for arranging monastic gardens. This was an act of blessing and continuity.

Interesting fact: After the Crimean War (1853–1856) and the defense of Sevastopol in Russia, there was a practice of bringing earth from the bastions and mass graves for placement in military temples and memorials. This can be considered one of the first large-scale secular (military-memorial) adaptations of an ancient religious ritual.

2. Semiotics of the Ritual: Layers of Meaning

Placing the amulet is a multi-level symbolic act:

Act of incorporation (inclusion): Foreign, distant, "heroic," or "painful" earth is physically incorporated into the body of the temple. In this way, the space of memory (battlefield, place of death) and the space of prayer (temple) merge. The temple becomes not only a monument but also a symbolic grave for all whose earth rests at its foundation.

Act of legitimation and consecration: The brought earth often undergoes a consecration ceremony. In this way, the historical event (often tragic) receives religious interpretation and is translated into the category of sacrifice or heroism in the name of faith or homeland. The ritual confers a sacred status on the event.

Act of community unity: Earth can be collected by the efforts of many people (veterans, searchers, residents), turning the act of its placement into a collective action for creating a "memory place." The temple becomes a point of convergence for a scattered group of memory.

Act of temporal transcription: The past (event) is materialized in the present (capsule) and placed for eternal storage in the future (the temple as the "eternal home"). This is an attempt to overcome oblivion, to make memory immutable, like the foundation of the temple.

3. Modern Practices: From Military Memory to Political Statements

Today, the ritual is actively used in different contexts:

Military-memorial practice: The most common case. Earth from the fields of battle of the Great Patriotic War (Prokhorovskoe Field, Kurgan of Glory, Mamay Kurgan) is brought for placement in temples. This is part of the state policy of memory, creating a unified narrative about sacrifice and victory, geographically "tied" to the central sacred object.

Memory of innocent victims, repressions, and new martyrs: earth from former concentration camps, death camps (Trostenez, Dachau, Flossenbürg, etc.), and GULAG camps is placed in temples dedicated to the executed and tortured in Nazi captivity, new martyrs, and confessors. Here, the ritual serves the church canonization of historical trauma and the remembrance of the victims.

Example: In the crypt of the Minsk temple-memorial in honor of All Saints and in memory of those who served to save the Fatherland, amulets with earth from places of memory are stored. This act created an unprecedented symbolic map of the Belarusian people's military glory and bravery from antiquity to the present, integrated into one sacred center. The rituals of placing amulets were regularly broadcast in the media, becoming a large-scale media event.

4. Critical Analysis: Between Memory and Instrumentalization

In modern world history and practice, the ritual is not free from criticism and contradictions:

Ritualization and devaluation: With mass, sometimes formal duplication, the ritual may lose depth, becoming an obligatory element of "patriotic design" for a new temple or monument.

Conflict of interpretations: Earth from the same place (for example, a battlefield) may be placed in temples by opposing sides, each of which will give the event its own meaning (heroism/tragedy, victory/defeat). Earth becomes a battlefield for competing memory narratives.

Ethical questions: Bringing earth from places of mass graves or concentration camps may be considered a violation of the peace of the dead, even if the goal is to eternalize memory. The context and method of collection (a sacred handful of earth from the roadside vs. exhumation) are important.

Conclusion: Sacred Geography of Memory

Placing an amulet with earth is a technology for creating a "sacred geography" where the physical territory of the country or history is symbolically summed up in one point – the temple. This is an attempt to overcome the gap between history (past event) and eternity (religious meaning), between the periphery (place of heroism) and the center (national place of worship).

In the modern world, where traditional forms of memory are eroding, this ritual offers a powerful, tangible, and emotionally charged form of conservation and transmission of collective identity. It works at the intersection of religion, history, and politics, being a vivid example of how archaic religious forms are filled with new, relevant content, serving the goals of national unity, the legitimation of power, and the fight against historical oblivion. Regardless of the assessment, this action proves that in the era of digital archives, material, "talking" earth still possesses immense symbolic power.

Permanent link to this publication: