Child Rights: History and Modernity — From Object of Care to Subject of Rights

Introduction: A Shift in Paradigm

The history of child rights reflects the evolution of perceptions of childhood and the child's place in society. Until the 20th century, children were predominantly viewed as objects in the legal sphere — either under parental authority (Roman patria potestas) or under state guardianship and charity. Modernity is marked by the shift to the concept of the child as a subject of rights, possessing their own inalienable freedoms and interests that the state is obligated to protect. This is a fundamental shift from "the right of the child" to "the rights of the child".

Historical Premises: From Industrialization to Humanization

The modern concept of child rights has been shaped by several key processes:

Industrial Revolution and the beginning of legislative protection: The widespread use of child labor in factories in the 18th and 19th centuries led to the first laws limiting the working day and age of children (e.g., the British Factory Acts of 1802 and 1833). This was the first step in recognizing the vulnerability of the child and the state's responsibility.

Child saving movement and juvenile justice: At the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, in the United States and Europe, the "child savers" movement emerged to combat neglect and child abuse. A significant legal innovation was the creation of the first juvenile court in Chicago (1899), based on the idea of rehabilitation rather than punishment.

The 1924 Declaration of the Rights of the Child (Geneva Declaration): Adopted by the League of Nations at the initiative of Eglantyne Jebb, the founder of Save the Children, it first formulated five principles of international child care. However, it was a moral rather than a legally binding document.

Key fact: In 1919, when the International Labour Organization (ILO) was established, one of its first conventions was Convention No. 5 on the Minimum Age for Admission to Employment in Industry (1919), setting the age limit at 14. This showed that child protection had become part of global social policy.

The 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Revolutionary Document

Adopted by the UN General Assembly on November 20, 1989, the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) became the fastest and most widely ratified international treaty in history (all UN member states except the United States have ratified it). It is not a declaration but a legally binding instrument based on four fundamental principles:

Non-discrimination (Article 2).

The best interests of the child (Article 3) — the principle that should be the primary consideration in any action concerning children.

The right to life, survival, and development (Article 6).

Respect for the views of the child (Article 12) — the child's right to freely express their opinion on matters affecting them and to be heard. This is the cornerstone of the idea of the child as a subject.

The Convention combines three groups of rights:

Rights to provision (the right to a name, citizenship, education, health care).

Rights to protection (from abuse, exploitation, abduction).

Rights to participation (freedom of thought, conscience, religion, access to information, participation in public life).

Example of implementation: Norway, starting in the 1980s, has consistently implemented the principle of Article 12 through the institution of the Ombudsman for Children (Barneombudet) and mandatory procedures for "hearing the child" in family courts, schools, and municipalities.

Contemporary Challenges and Expansion of the Agenda

For 30+ years after the adoption of the CRC, the context has changed, presenting new challenges:

The digital environment: The rights of the child have encountered new risks (cyberbullying, grooming, exploitation of personal data) and opportunities. The response has been the emergence of the concept of digital rights of children. In 2021, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child issued General Comment No. 25, specifying the application of the CRC in the digital space.

Climate change: Children are recognized as the most vulnerable group to the consequences of the climate crisis (malnutrition, diseases, psychological trauma). This has given rise to the movement for climate justice for children and the first strategic legal actions where children (such as in the case "Children v. Climate Crisis" in the European Court of Human Rights) demand that states fulfill their obligations to protect their future.

Migration and refugees: Millions of children worldwide are in situations of forced displacement. The Convention requires states to ensure the protection of child refugees and migrants regardless of their status, which often conflicts with migration policy.

Interesting fact: In 2020, Susanne Pritzl, a 16-year-old activist from Austria, filed a complaint with the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child against five countries (Argentina, Brazil, France, Germany, Turkey) for inaction on climate change, arguing that this violates her rights to life, health, and culture. Although the committee did not recognize a violation on procedural grounds, it first clearly stated that a state can be held responsible for climate damage caused to children outside its borders if it is a major emitter.

Criticism and Debates

The realization of child rights faces criticism:

Cultural relativism: The universality of the rights of the child is challenged by some states and cultures that assert the priority of traditional family values and parental rights.

Overprotection vs. autonomy: The balance between protecting the child and respecting their growing autonomy remains a subject of debate. The concept of "the right to risk" in child development sometimes contradicts the principle of safety.

Institutional problems: In many countries, the child protection system remains punitive and institutional (orphanages), rather than family-oriented, which contradicts the spirit of the Convention.

Conclusion: From Formal Norms to Real Participation

The history of child rights demonstrates impressive progress: from complete disfranchisement to recognition at the highest international level. The 1989 Convention set a universal standard. However, modernity shows that formal recognition of rights is insufficient.

The future of child rights lies in the realization of the right to participation. This means not just consulting with children but involving them in decision-making processes in the family, school, city, and at the global level on issues that concern them — from designing the school playground to climate policy. The era when adults decide for children is coming to an end. The new paradigm requires that adults decide together with children, recognizing their competence and unique perspective on the world. The rights of the child cease to be merely a set of protective measures, becoming a tool for building a more inclusive, fair, and sustainable society for all.
© elib.ng

Permanent link to this publication: