Objectivity of Love in Philosophy and ReligionIs love only a feeling? Or something more? For many, it is an ephemeral spark that can be extinguished. But philosophy and religion insist: love is objective. It is not just inside us. It is between us. It sets the structure of existence, ethics, and meaning. Even when we do not feel love, it remains a reality to which we are called.Love as an ontological connection Even Plato in "The Symposium" spoke of Eros as a force connecting the finite with the eternal. Love, according to Plato, is not just a desire for the body, but a longing for beauty itself. This is a striving for truth. In this sense, love is not a subjective caprice, but a fundamental structure of existence. We love because the world is arranged so that we can connect. In Christianity, this idea is strengthened: God is Love. Love is not an attribute of God, but His essence. And if God is the foundation of everything, then love is the very fabric of reality.Love as an ethical principle Immanuel Kant did not write about love as a feeling. But his categorical imperative — to treat a person as an end in themselves and not as a means — is a philosophical expression of love. In the 20th century, Emmanuel Levinas went further: love is responsibility for the Other. The face of the Other calls me to account. This is not an emotion, but a duty that I cannot avoid. Martin Buber in "I and Thou" speaks of a true encounter that goes beyond utility. Love is not my project, but an event in which I participate.Religious dimension: agape In the New Testament, love — agape — is not a romantic feeling and not a brotherly attachment. It is unconditional, sacrificing love that does not depend on the merits of the object. It is objective in the sense that it is a norm to which we are called, even when we do not want to. "Love your enemies" is not advice, but a commandment. It does not appeal to feelings. It addresses the will. And therefore, love is not what we feel, but what we do ... Read more